Schedule an introduction

The Drama Triangle

In this episode, we examine the drama triangle, a powerful psychological model developed by Stephen Karpman in the 1960s within Transactional Analysis. The model illustrates how people in conversations and conflicts often—unconsciously—step into fixed roles: Victim, Persecutor, or Rescuer.

These three roles reinforce each other and sustain the dynamic. The Victim feels powerless, evades responsibility, and points to others. The Victim can even exert power by accusing others or demanding help, making it a particularly attractive position. The Persecutor adopts an accusing or aggressive stance and operates according to the principle “I’m OK, you’re not OK.” And the Rescuer appears to act nobly by offering help, but often does so uninvited and from the conviction that the other person cannot do it themselves. In doing so, they confirm the victimhood and undermine growth and responsibility.

The power of the model lies in its relatability. Everyone has experienced situations where these three roles were present: in families, in teams, in the workplace, and in politics and society. Consider the father who feels like a victim because dinner isn’t ready, the mother who reacts as a persecutor by lashing out in anger, and then perhaps ends up in the victim role herself. Or think of discussions at work or in the media where groups present themselves as victims, label others as persecutors, and seek support from rescuers. Roles shift rapidly, causing conversations to become deadlocked and leading to polarization.

It is important to note that Karpman speaks about psychological positions, not about factual victims or perpetrators. Of course, actual victims and perpetrators exist (for example, in a crime), and there, factual rescuers like the police or emergency services are necessary. But in most daily interactions, it concerns subjective experiences: I feel like a victim, I see you as a persecutor, or I assume the role of rescuer. That insight makes the drama triangle so useful for better understanding communication.

The podcast delves deeper into the three roles:

  • Victim: ranging from the dramatic lament (“poor me”), to the angry accusing variant, to learned helplessness. The great advantage of this role is that you do not have to take responsibility—you shift the blame to someone else. Typical behavior includes complaining, accusing, seeking support, or waiting passively.
  • Persecutor: someone who makes reproaches, condemns, or belittles. This can be loud and aggressive, but also subtle and passive-aggressive. The conviction here is: “I'm OK, you're not.”
  • Rescuer: jumps in to help from the conviction that the other person is incapable. Often well-intentioned, but the result is that the other person remains passive and relinquishes responsibility. We see this in the workplace, in parenting, and in societal debates.

A common thread throughout the episode is the question: how do you step out of the drama triangle? The answer begins with awareness. As soon as you recognize yourself in one of the three roles, you can press a pause button and consider: which value or need of mine is being affected here? By investigating that, you take responsibility for your own emotions instead of shifting them onto others.

Additionally, there are other strategies:

  • With a Victim: do not rescue immediately, but ask questions (“What exactly is affecting you? What step can you take yourself?”).
  • With a Persecutor: work on empathy and listen to the 'why' behind the other person's behavior.
  • With a Rescuer: pull the handbrake and first check what help is actually needed, instead of automatically taking everything over.
This creates more space for genuine dialogue, mutual understanding, and constructive solutions. The drama triangle is therefore not just a theoretical model, but a practical compass for better understanding and breaking through stalled conversations and conflicts—at home, at work, and in society.

Insights on leadership, communication, and collaboration in practice

Discover articles and videos on behavior, difficult conversations, team dynamics, and influence — with practical tools that work, even when the pressure is on.
Frequently Asked Questions

You may still have questions about how we work or what you can expect. Here, we answer the most important ones.

people
Is your question not listed?
Schedule an introduction

+32(0)486-85 15 26

Participants will approach their communication with others differently in the broadest sense of the word, even when situations become difficult or tense. They experience more calm and self-confidence, and have a better understanding of what to do instead of simply reacting to events. The difference lies in conscious action: not being at the mercy of the situation or the conversation, but engaging with it actively and curiously. The focus is on individual behavioral change, which has a visible impact on interactions with colleagues, employees, and clients. Participants often notice a difference during the training itself, which is then further reinforced through practical application.
Yes. Content, methods, language, and cases are fully tailored to the organization’s context. Where necessary, I explicitly immerse myself in the sector, the role, or the workplace itself. Context determines how people communicate and make decisions, and therefore determines how a training program is designed.
Our training programs are suitable for anyone who works with people and is willing to examine their own behavior. They are less effective when participants are under heavy pressure to attend and show no willingness to open up. We address this explicitly.
Transfer is central. We work on awareness and practice with real-life situations during the training, so that participants gain successful experiences. Where possible, we provide follow-up with participants and the client, and together we examine which contextual obstacles might hinder practical application.
The training always starts from the participants’ reality. We work with their own cases, combine reflection with practice and dialogue, and only introduce insights when they are needed. It is not a classroom-style transfer of theory or a PowerPoint-driven training.
Dealing with resistance is a core competency. We create safety and neutrality, name what is happening, and investigate the needs behind the resistance. We do not force anything, but create space so that participants can move forward again and take responsibility for their own learning process.
We always start from what is feasible within the available time. There is no fixed format: we adapt to needs, context, and workload. Where meaningful and desirable, we supplement physical sessions with preparation, digital elements, or phased trajectories to use time efficiently.
We do not work with tricks or imposed behavior. We also look “below the waterline” at beliefs, fears, and automatic patterns that block new behavior. As a result, people dare and are able to apply what they have learned outside the training, in their actual work situation.
Impact becomes visible in behavior. We work with observations from the client and participants, targeted reflection questions, and feedback during the training. Satisfaction is a starting point, but more important is whether people feel confident enough to effectively apply the new behavior.
Follow-up steps are always discussed with the client. This could be a debriefing on transfer, additional depth on specific themes, or individual coaching. The client decides what is desirable and feasible within their own context.
We are happy to think along with you about your context, challenges, and objectives. Not a standard solution, but a targeted approach that works in practice.

Schedule an intake interview

We help organizations bridge the gap between expertise and impact. Let us know how we can help you.